Are Vaccines Killing Our Children?

by Dr. Robert O. Young / FRIDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2006

DrYoung I am honored to be able to share with you some very important information on Hep B vaccine and its toxic affect on children. This article is written by Sinead Dumigan and represents many of my own researched findings that I documented over ten years ago and published in a technical essay entitled, "A Second Thought about Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis."

There are two scriptures in the Bible that come to mind as I think about how vaccines are killing us by poisoning and acidifying the delicate alkaline pH of our blood and tissues. The first is: Hosea 4:6 - My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge, and the second, Luke 10:3 - Behold I send you as lambs amongst wolves.

Society has inadvertently witnessed the most gruesome and belligerent attacks imaginable; a massacre of innocence executed with such spite and audacity, yet hidden meticulously by a protected veil of secrecy.

Mandatory vaccination has forever altered the beauty of childhood, but the true deception lies within the ironic twist of events stemming from a parent's attempts to protect the life of their child. Oblivious to the evil at work, parents follow vaccine stipulations with a blind faith, finding solace only in hearing their children have been spared from the pain and desperation such diseases inflict.

Never before has reality been so critically distorted; with every secret comes a stream of tears. It is too late coming for many, but truth remains the only hope for the future of humanity.

The alleged Hepatitis B virus (HBV) threat to infants is, quite possibly, anew low for the American government, which, in itself, is a difficult task to accomplish, but especially since the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) indicates high risk populations as "sexually active ...adults with more than one sex partner … or have a history of sexually transmitted disease; homosexual or bisexual men; illicit injection drug users … at occupational risk … hemo-dialysis patient … clients and staff of institutions."

Generally, and with as much sarcasm as can be conveyed, not too many newborns fit any of the profiles mentioned above. Moreover, citizens are given the impression that HBV infections are life threatening, but in all actuality, roughly 50% of those exposed show no symptoms at all; while another 30% experience flu-like symptoms for a few weeks, but both recover entirely and develop lifelong immunity in the process.

The residual 20% of people exposed to HBV may develop jaundice, nausea, abdominal pain, fever, appetite loss, fatigue, itching, or in serious cases, liver cancer or cirrhoses.

Now, of those 20% who do experience these symptoms, 95% will recover completely leaving only 5% as chronic carriers, which, completelycontradicts the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC)statement in 1991, that "1 million-1.25 million persons with chronic HBVinfection in the United States are potentially infectious to others," alongwith the American Medical Association's (AMA) 1994 statement that "more than 4,000 people die each year from hepatitis B related liver disease …before … vaccine, over 30,000 children were infected annually".

In any case, Hepatitis B vaccines (Hep B) have evolved into an acceptedpart of a newborns life, but only when the motives for such arecommendation are exposed can parents truly comprehend the disgrace thatis mandatory inoculation.

In view of pre-mandate data establishing the U.S. had maintained one of thelowest incidence rates of HBV infection (0.1% to 0.5%) for decades,combined with additional information showing a 10% decrease in annuallyreported cases since 1986, officials were well aware that their ploy wouldrequire some serious "encouragement" for it to have any chance of beingaccepted.

Therefore, the CDC preempted impending resistance by issuing a reportwarning the public that an estimated 200,000-300,000 new hepatitis Binfections occurred annually during the period 1980-1991.

Though, what officials failed to mention was that according to the 2001paper, Incidence of Hep B Virus in USA, "national estimates of hepatitis Bincidence are corrected for underreporting using an algorithm that adjustsincidence upward by approximately 6-fold … this item is not amenable tosurvey data collection due to low incidence."

In reality, out of the 3.9 million births in 1996, there were only 54 casesof infant HBV, making the occurrence rate a meager 0.001%; though, as timewould reveal, during the same year, the Vaccine Adverse Event ReportingSystem (VAERS) shows 1,080 infants suffered serious reactions to Hep Binjections, among those are 47 families who will never see their babiesagain because they died.

Nonetheless, the damage had already been done. In 1991, the ACIP of theCDC, along with help from the American Academy of Pediatric (AAP),successfully persuaded state health officials to issue mandates compellingevery child entering daycare or school to show proof they had receivedthree doses of Hep B.

As 1997 came to a close, 35 states had vaccination requirements for school children; yet, prenatal screening, the one sure way to minimize HBVtransmission, was mandated in only 15 states, according to the NationalVaccine Information Center.

Clearly, America's health was not the driving force behind the calamity of mass vaccination. Organizations such as the Hepatitis B Coalition, Robert Wood JohnsonFoundation, World Health Organization, All Kids Count, Children's VaccineInitiative, CDC, FDA, state health officials, drug manufacturers, doctors,nurses, and even pharmacists glorified and pushed infant vaccination untilAmericans had been infiltrated lock, stock, and barrel; all in attempts toprevent a condition where infants "represented <10%.